Competitive Advantages
Pro-teq Systems' technology delivers three core competitive advantages:
Speed
Earthquake Warning must provide protection for all locations, regardless of where the epicenter occurs. In a large earthquake, the S-wave typically arrives at the surface 0.9 seconds after the P-wave. Pro‑teq's technology can produce a warning in 0.5-0.75 seconds, thus beating the S‑wave to the surface and providing enough time for many automated actions. This is one way Pro‑teq manages to eliminate the Blind Zone. The best competing early earthquake warning technology takes over 4 seconds, which produces a Blind Zone of at least 8 miles.
Accuracy
Automated actions can protect equipment and assets but there is often a shutdown cost. Since equipment can withstand varying amounts of shaking before damage occurs, a shutdown should only happen if the shaking will likely cause damage. Pro‑teq's technology estimates shaking intensity directly from P-wave analysis. This is unique and results in a speed advantage as well as providing better intensity estimates.
Reliability
No system that produces false alarms can be used to control business processes. Pro‑teq's design goal was to eliminate false alarms: there is no tolerable lower limit. Competing systems often treat false alarms as inevitable outcomes of earthquake warning. This makes them unsuitable for commercial applications.
Other Competitive Advantages
In addition to the core advantages described above, there are additional advantages of Pro‑teq's approach to earthquake warning:
Capability | Benefit | Competition Comparison |
---|---|---|
End-to-end integration |
We ensure that warnings are reliably delivered to the place of use. |
Warning generation and applications are separated functions in other earthquake warning systems, leaving no single organization that assumes overall responsibility to ensure that protective measures are taken. |
Control and alerts | Our focus is on initiating automated protective measures. |
Protective measures are ignored, an afterthought, or left entirely to the end-user in public earthquake warning systems. We support a full complement of control interfaces. |
Alert policies | We permit the end user to specify rules that decide when and which protective actions are to be taken. |
There is no known similar capability in any other earthquake warning system, which generally choose for the end-user when an action is to be taken or provide qualitative thresholds the user can select. |
End-to-end security | Information and communications security were fundamental design requirements to protect against malicious interference. |
Other systems treat security as an afterthought, or as the last task to be completed in implementation, which is not the way to build a secure system. |
Customer driven | We can provide real savings. | We listen to the end users and respond to their requirements rather than dictate what they should accept. |